John Pilger, the British journalist, has visited Iraq and
reported extensively on what he has seen. Reading his
commentary, one begins to understand how brutal lies can be.
Before the Gulf
War, Iraq had one of the lowest infant mortality rates in the world.
Today it is the highest. The economic sanctions imposed by the
United Nations Security Council denied Iraq the equipment it needed
to clean up the battlefields from the Gulf War. The battlefields
needed to be cleaned up because the depleted uranium that was
discharged by American and British bombs carried with them a silent
death that was far more devastating than the initial blasts would
have suggested. There are regions in Iraq where as many as 40% of
the children living nearby now have cancer. It is not unusual for
several children in one family to have cancer. Those who don't have
cancer today are expected to get it later in life.
rate for children under 5 was running 4,000 per month in the year
2000 when one of the articles I am referring to was written.1
The sanctions, which Pilger calls, "the most ruthless embargo
in modern history," is killing mostly children. The
children of Iraq are dying of hunger and malnutrition, dysentery and
other diseases associated with the lack of sanitation. The
children are dying for lack of medicines and medical supplies.
The only painkiller doctors can offer their cancer ridden patients
is aspirin, because the sanctions preclude the purchase of morphine.
It was American bombs that took out public sanitation and the
general infrastructure of the country. Apparently anything
that might have been of value to someone in uniform was a target
even if it was also vital to the general population. The
sanctions have been unnecessarily vindictive and cruel.
As far as I
can tell, the American strategy as it applies to Iraq has been...
"If we destroy life, as these people know it, perhaps they will
blame Saddam Hussein and run him out of office." But that
is only part of the strategy. It appears to me that the other
part is... "If we destroy life as these people know it, we can
then come in, control the oil, and no one will be able to do
anything about it." I think this is all about oil, not
about terrorism. There is no greater terrorism than when it
rains US bombs. And after each rain storm, we call the
deadócollateral damage. They call the deadó family and
friends. This is not about Saddam's evil intentions.
When Saddam poisoned the Kurds, the US Government said nothing.
Saddam Hussein is a product of the CIA and American policy, but that
is another story.
In 1996, when
then Secretary of State Madeline Albright was asked during a 60
Minutes interview about the hundreds of thousands of children in
Iraq who have died because of the sanctions, and whether she thought
the price was worth it... she replied:
"I think this is a very hard choice, but the price...
we think the price is worth it."
WE think the
price is worth it? Who is this WE and who has a right to think such
a thing or to make such decisions about other people's children...
in my name, in your name?
So you could
argue, "Don't blame us for the death of these children, Saddam
Hussein could have stopped the sanctions at any time. Blame
him." Well I do blame him. But that doesn't absolve
us from the part we played. We knew or should have known that
Saddam Hussein would rather let his people suffer than give in to
outside pressure. So we knowingly chose to pursue a strategy
that guaranteed his people WOULD suffer. And we didn't stop
when we saw the results. We used the pain and deaths of these
children to try to pressure Saddam Hussein to do what... leave town?
It was, and still is, an ignorant, indefensible, cruel policy.
A year after
Albright's appearance on 60 Minutes: "...in an interview with
CNN reporter Peter Arnett, Osama Bin Laden directly stated that,
'A REACTION MIGHT TAKE PLACE as a result of U.S.
Government's execution of over 600,000 Iraqi children by preventing
food and medicine from reaching them.'" 2
Did George Bush
know all this when he said the reason terrorists hate us is because
they hate freedom and democracy?. Of course he did. I'm
not saying all terrorists are rational or that they all know what
they are fighting for. But Bush was lying and he knew it. And
so did the press and every other government official who works
within a 50 mile radius of the White House, and this hypocrisy is
also known in the halls of every foreign government.
When a plaintiff
comes into a United States court, he is expected to come to the
court with 'clean hands' or the court will not grant relief. To have
'clean hands' means that the party bringing the action is not
engaged in immoral or illegal acts. The United States does not have
'clean hands.' Can you guess why the Bush team does not want to
prosecute terrorists in a public court of law? Can you imagine that
if these criminals were prosecuted in public view, they might have
an opportunity to argue that the plaintiff does not come to this
court with 'clean hands'? Is it any wonder that Bush refuses to
acknowledge the authority of the World Court to potentially charge a
US citizen with crimes against humanity?
If George Bush
ends up removing Saddam Hussein from power, maybe the children of
Iraq will be better off than they are now. But that's not a
certainty. How many innocent civilian lives will be lost in the war?
Would you care to guess? If children or other innocent
civilians had any currency in the formation of US policy, most of
the sanctions would have been lifted a long time ago, and we would
not now be worried about terrorism in the first place.
This is about
oil. Trading basic human decency for oil. Oil is costing us our
humanity, our freedoms, our self respect, and before too long
perhaps the lives of more of our own children. And what will our
children think of us when they eventually find out what our
government has been up to? None of us is innocent, because WE are
the government. Remember...? WE THE PEOPLE. Is war the only science
we know? The people who represent us, are now, and have been
for a long time, out of control and out of touch. Enough is
enough. We each need to accept our responsibility as citizens before
it's too late. And if we can't come together to find new common
ground and formulate a strategy that is based on principles of honor
and basic human decency, then perhaps between our apathy and
government's negligence, The Great Experiment will, after all of
this, have finally come to naught. Start by checking out this story.
Here are the referenced links:
Arnett's Interview with Osama Bin Laden
This article is dedicated to Ruth Wood, who was my
homeroom teacher at Pennsauken High School in New Jersey and who
loved me as she loved all children, and stayed my friend and had
faith in me for over 40 years. Her former students live in every
corner of this country. She died in Knoxville, Tennessee, on Sunday
Wounds of War