The
Democratic Party is every bit as illegitimate as the
Republican Party. Let
me start by defining my terms.
When I talk about the Democratic Party in this context,
I am talking about elected representatives, not private
citizens who simply call themselves Democrats.
Let's review these simple facts:
- Bush
was not legally elected president in 2000. His election was a fraud.
This is not about the Supreme Court giving Bush the
election. The
fraud I am speaking about was discovered after the Supreme
Court made their decision and gave Bush the election.
Greg Palast has documented this fraud in his book,
"The Best Democracy Money Can Buy."
I am not an attorney, but it is my understanding
that there is no statute of limitations on fraud.
This kind of fraud also happens to be treason.
Some of the fraud was known when the Black Caucus
stood up to challenge the election.
When they did, not one Senator was willing to give
them the time of day.
Cowards and fools... every one.
So not only did the Democrats allow Bush to become
President when he was not legitimately elected, but they
did not challenge his presidency when it was demonstrated
later that his election was accomplished only through
fraud. They
didn't want to cause a Constitutional crisis is perhaps
what they will tell you.
But in reality they didn't have the courage or the
moral fiber to defend the Constitution and the legitimacy
of American elections.
(Who knows now if legitimate elections are even
possible anymore. I wish I were exaggerating.)
Democrats simply folded when they saw they didn't have
public sentiment on their side, when they couldn't control
the spin. But
this was a legal question.
This required and called for a fundamental defense
of the Constitution and here they failed in their sacred
duty; they failed to stand up and tell the truth when they
knew what the truth was.
- Bush
was fraudulently elected again in 2004.
Large numbers of American citizens actually
conspired to cheat to win.
Treason. Again.
Not one party whig was held to account for all the fraud
and attempted fraud. Could he have won without the
fraud? I don't know. The attempts were ignored
or covered up but the statistical analysis points to
another fraudulent election.
- If
you are able to convince yourself that Bush was not
legitimately elected, then it follows that all the major
decisions that he made as president were also
illegitimate. Nothing
he has done should stand.
He is and has been a "pretender to the
throne." He was only able to maintain his illegitimate power
because the Democrats conspired to give him a pass. They allowed a coup, the overthrow of our legitimate government.
But what do I mean by "conspire."
I mean that every elected official made a decision
to accept the decision of the group; not one elected
official was willing to stand alone on his or her own
cognizance to challenge the illegitimate president.
The party stuck together and failed us.
Let me say it again:
there is no statute of limitation on fraud and this
president has fraudulently held his office now since 2000.
He is not and never was the duly elected president
of the United States, except by the agreement of his
co-conspirators… and of course, that includes we the
American people.
Do our elected officials believe Bush was elected fairly?
Do you? Do you believe they will admit to you what they
really believe? Is
there one who will tell the truth in public?
No. So far, no.
- Now
let's talk about Bush's decisions and his initiatives,
many of which would have been and still are
unconstitutional no matter who would have pursued them.
This "pretender" has undermined and/or
dismantled many principles of the Constitution and of
international law. He
has in the process committed war crimes, crimes against
peace, crimes against humanity, crimes against the
American people, and most certainly crimes against the
people of Afghanistan and Iraq.
These are impeachable offenses and so far, (as far
as I am aware), not one elected Democrat from any state…
in fact, not one elected Democrat who holds ANY elective office has
publicly called for Bush's impeachment,1 certainly not one
member of the House of Representatives. They
all took the same oath of office.
If you are reading this, there is a very high
probability that you have been following the issues and
you know in your heart that Bush has committed
impeachable offenses.
And yet not one elected official has the courage to
state this simple truth.
How can that be?
And yet you are probably still treating these
conspirators as allies when in fact they have conspired
against you and your children and your country.
How many of us still write them letters and appeal to them
to act with a conscience?
I say they are not worth the effort. They sap
your power. They are a waste of time. Why do
they need you to tell them what to do? If they don't
already know, what good are they?
Why do they conspire against us?
I believe it is because they value their jobs,
their status, more than they value their honor or their
country. They
may not be conscious of this but this is how it is. They
may not be guilty of any crime… lacking courage and/or
wisdom is not a crime.
But they have failed to honor their oath of office.
They are supposed to lead.
But they neither lead nor follow.
They just hide.
They will not fight… but they will send our
children to fight... to kill, to die, to become insane.
Betrayed.
- These
people have failed us. I am arguing that these people cannot be counted on to
protect our heritage.
These people cannot be counted on to lead or
inspire us to accomplish what we need to accomplish if we
are going to continue as a free people. I am arguing that
we need to have the courage to let go of the past, to
reclaim the power that belongs to us… us… We the
People. This
government… this two party corrupt government has failed
us. Let go of
the past, let go of them. Recapture the spirit that
is still somewhere in your blood. I believe if we do
not... we, as a people, are likely to lose our heritage,
our dignity, and our freedom, and not get it back for a
very long time.
- There
are those who will say that I am a radical. As far as I know, I am only sharing with you the
realizations that are obvious to me from of my own
observations. I
believe in your heart you share these same observations.
As long as we deny the truth of our own experience
we will not be able to reclaim our perspective or hold on
to our dignity. We need to tell the truth.
I believe we are at a crossroads.
I believe that in acknowledging the truth, we can
open the door to an advanced civilization where people
live in peace and dream with honor.
We have a choice.
We can either move ahead or fall back.
This is not the time to falter.
This is the time to trust the best that is in us;
this is the time to look ahead.
- So
what am I suggesting?
I say there is no mention of political parties in
the Constitution. I
say our founding fathers hated and feared political
parties. I am suggesting that we identify
likely candidates for public office… people who are not
attached to the old consciousness, but people who have a
vision for a new beginning.
I am suggesting that we disown any political party
identification... that
we in fact, reject the Democratic party and Republican
party and every party as failed institutions.
I am suggesting that we start anew, use our
imagination, find a way to elect people of vision and
character. We
have the internet, we have each other. We have the tools if we can hold onto them.
We don't need to be a majority.
We only need to have a better vision, more
character, and more determination than the majority.
I say we start here and we start now.
Before it's too late.
We need to redefine what government of the People,
by the People, and for the People means.
I say, let's talk.
Mark A.
Goldman
www.gpln.com/citizen.htm
1 As
of today, 2/28/07 there are, in fact, some state
representatives who are standing up to defend the
Constitution. These people are worthy of our vote.
In Washington State, for example, recently elected State
Senator Eric Oemig has drafted state legislation asking for
the impeachment of Bush and others.
P.S.
If you don't believe the underlying assumptions I've
made regarding fraud and crimes, then you haven't done your
homework. You
need to catch up. It
takes time but all the documentation is there.
Ask around. Seek
knowledge. Become
informed. If you don't know where to start, start here, click and read
every link you come to… every link you come to:
www.gpln.com
Re:
2004 election
Return to Commentary
|